Page 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  End  |    |  Discussion Board

SETON

THE HOUSE OF SETON OF SCOTLAND

 

Updated:  Tuesday  15 February 2005


 
Bayeux TapestryThe Flemish Origins  

There is no doubt that Charlemagnic blood was for some hundreds of years after that monarch’s death the elixir of Europe. As late as the 19th century the eminent historian, Sir Francis Palgrave could write: “Not only throughout the Middle Ages but long after that era there was a species of mystical pre-eminence attached to the Carlovingian lineage, which those who could claim the honour nourished, though often in silence.”

Flanders had been founded early in the 9th century by the semi-legendary Lideric, who came, said the early chroniclers, from somewhere in the south of France into a land empty of everything but forest, and cleared it. This was shortly after the death of Charlemagne, who had of course been it’s overlord. The marriage between Lideric’s grandson, Baldwin I, and Judith, daughter of Charles the Bald of France, brought a respectability and a strength to Flanders; it also put the magic Carolingian blood into the veins of the comital house, since the bride was Charlemagne’s great-granddaughter.

In the 9th and 10th centuries the comparative stability and prosperity of Flanders caused a number of ancient comtes around her perimeter to attach themselves to the new power. Among them were Hainaut, Mons, Louvian, Alost (or Gand), and Guines. Boulogne, with it’s own subsidiary comtes of Lens, Hesdin and St. Pol, was also allied to Flanders, as was Ponthieu, away on the Norman border. All were linked by close personal ties to the comital family of the Baldwins. All regarded themselves, and were ruled in 1066 by men directly descended from Charlemagne.

Through Lothair, son of Charlemagne’s third son, Louis the Pious, the counts of Alost trace a connection with the Holy Roman Empire; Guines was an offshoot of this house via Theodoric, Count of Gand, a younger son of that count of Alost who had married Lieutgarde, daughter of Count Arnulf I of Flanders – himself a ruler who was not only a Charlemagne descendant but had married one in Adela (some genealogists call her Alix), daughter of Count Hubert II of Vermandois, whose own great house descended directly from Pepin, King of Italy, Charlemagne’s second son. The richest Carolingian ancestry of all was that enjoyed by the Count Eustace II of Boulogne; not only did he descend, through Ponthieu and Guines, from Charlemagne’s favourite daughter, Berthe, and the poet-courtier, Angilbert, who during the emporer’s lifetime had been given west Flanders to rule over, but he was also the great-grandson, through his mother, Maud of Louvain, of Charles, Duke of Lorraine, the last male heir of the Carolingians.

Through all the troubled years after the death of Charlemagne, Flanders and its subsidiary comets had managed to retain something of his rule, keeping a living continuity with its precepts which was in marked contrast with the rest of the Frankish empire. The castle of the counts of Flanders at Ghent was a somber place, desperately fortified by Lideric against the Viking invaders, and expanded in later generations to express a somewhat brutal strength. His armies and those of his descendants, the Baldwins, were stalwart, well-trained, and all but unbeatable. About the chateau at Boulogne there was an altogether different atmosphere, a sort of luxurious assurance, recognizable as the epitome of aristocracy, that gave the equally efficient forces there an extra quality of gallantry and bravura.